This is a question for both of you, how did you first come together and how did the project evolve to lead to the research opinion essay in the Lancet?
Alexi: Because of the nature of our project, all of us young people came from very different experiences. And we weren’t all physically in the same place. As one online platform, we used Zoom.
I found it interesting because we were able to connect with people across New South Wales to get that different perspective. For example, I try to advocate for the rural aspect. Other students in our group had that inner city knowledge of different pressures and problems, which I’m not aware of. It’s good to have those different perspectives and it made our research and the published paper better.
Stephanie: With health consumer research, it’s always a bit of a chicken and egg thing with the funding. We already had the funding to do specific research because we had to write the application. At the same time, we were trying to get new, adolescent-led ideas and include these in the research too.
We gave our new, young research partners a brief overview of our research project. And then, instead of going into the actual project that’s funding them – which is to develop a digital health intervention for young people to support nutrition and physical activity – we just wanted to understand what the top issues for young people are.
So, the first few sessions were just spent understanding and discussing that. The three concepts for the published essay came from those discussions where everyone contributed.
We also found that people were quite shy at the beginning, which is fair enough. Not everyone is comfortable just voicing their own opinions on Zoom with strangers. When we moved to Slack (Editor’s Note: an online platform for teamwork and discussions), a lot of young people felt more comfortable contributing that way.
And how did that end up as a published article?
Stephanie: From that Zoom and Slack content, I asked the group to write a 200–300-word summary that we could just use to guide our group forward. But instead, the students went off and wrote a 2000-word essay, which led to their article. And that was really their published essay, not mine. But the essay also provides a great underlying foundation of what the key issues in the eyes of young people for future chronic diseases are – and what we can do about it. Which is what I need for my research.
Alexi, you said that you are trying to advocate for rural communities. Do you have any tips for researchers or health engagement staff who want to include young people’s perspectives from rural and remote NSW in their projects?
Alexi: I would never have known about this if I wasn’t even in the right networks. So, I think staff or researchers should reach directly out to schools and youth councils. That’s how I first found out about the projects I have been involved with. You will end up with 2-3 students who are passionate about what you do from a rural background. I really think the school level is where the best kind of engagement occurs, and you should include the teachers too as they can facilitate your contact with the students.
But I think social media is important too. Quite a lot of my friends in HAPYUS found out about it via socials. And the program needs to be set up online using a good online platform so it’s accessible for us outside the big cities. I would have loved to be at our actual in-person, face-to-face meeting in Sydney (Editor’s note: HAPYUS had some in-person opportunities in Sydney). It just was bad timing for me. But it would be good if that would be all paid too if we wanted to come to be there in person.